Download The EU's Transformative Power: Europeanization through by Heather Grabbe PDF

By Heather Grabbe

In 2004, the ecu Union undertook an remarkable addition of ten new nations. it will essentially swap the european, and the Union has already had a dramatic effect at the improvement of the hot member states. The EU's Transformative Power provides an in depth research of the way the european has formed international locations of principal and japanese Europe because the fall of communism.

Show description

Read Online or Download The EU's Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe PDF

Similar eastern books

Autobiography and Authorship in Renaissance Verse (Early Modern Literature in History)

The appearance of rather affordable versions within the mid-16th century produced an explosion of verse, a lot of which represented the 1st individual speaker as a model of the writer. This booklet examines ways that writers, usually looking development of their careers, harnessed verse for self-promotional reasons.

The Leader Cult in Communist Dictatorships: Stalin and the Eastern Bloc

The 1st ebook to investigate the detailed chief cults that flourished within the period of 'High Stalinism' as an essential component of the approach of dictatorial rule within the Soviet Union and jap Europe. Fifteen stories discover the best way those cults have been demonstrated, their functionality and operation, their dissemination and reception, where of the cults in paintings and literature, the exportation of the Stalin cult and its implantment within the communist states of jap Europe, and the impression which de-Stalinisation had on those cults.

Extra resources for The EU's Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe

Example text

In particular, all five countries that started negotiations in 1998 had become functioning market economies and were close to becoming competitive in the single market. The EU was able to conclude negotiations at the end of 2002 because Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia caught up fairly quickly with the front-runners, despite starting negotiations two years later. However, Bulgaria and Romania lagged behind, although the Sofia government made better progress than its counterpart in Bucharest. The final two years of negotiations were slowed by hold-ups over the free movement of persons and the allocation of regional funds.

Moreover, by 2000, the EU’s accession policy was already firmly set, owing to the structure of the negotiations and the rules governing Phare and other aid funds. It is generally difficult for the EU to use progress in negotiations or aid strategically to encourage or reward countries for reasons that are not directly related to accession. The Regular Reports in 1999 and 2000 used encouraging language about Bulgaria, and Bulgaria’s prospects were improving owing to greater macroeconomic stability, so it was possible for the Commission to argue that Bulgaria had made sufficient progress to warrant negotiations.

The Accession Partnerships extended the Commission’s mandate further by giving it responsibility for setting priorities, reviewing the applicants’ progress in meeting objectives, and recommending whether candidates should be in negotiations or not. Although final decisions on applying conditionality (either on aid or accession) were left to the Council, the Commission largely determined the agenda by overseeing the whole process and managing the programmes. 11 In this way, the parallel operation of the Accession Partnerships alongside negotiations gave the Commission a much larger influence over accession terms than had been the case in previous enlargements.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.27 of 5 – based on 28 votes