By Karen Cordrick Haely
Clinical wisdom is generally thought of to be the main definite form of wisdom, loose from social or cultural bias. This freedom from bias or values, the objectivity of technology, is a key the reason is, medical wisdom holds its privileged place in society.Karen Cordrick Haely argues that feminist critics of technology current compelling purposes to eschew the concept technological know-how is, or can be, in basic terms target within the feel typically understood to intend 'value-free'. This publication examines the main famous feminist rules relating to easy methods to revise and improve the concept that of objectivity such that we will comprehend, although now not unavoidably cast off, the position of cultural and social pursuits as they play a task in technological know-how. Haely argues that those perspectives of objectivity needs to be handled as a community of rules, instead of as stand-alone strategies to the complexities of forming a cohesive philosophical view of medical objectivity. The ebook additionally offers a panorama of a number of concerns which are an important for figuring out the intersection of feminism and technological know-how.
Read or Download Objectivity in the Feminist Philosophy of Science PDF
Similar feminist theory books
Makes a speciality of feminist analyses of race and ethnicity - at present some of the most rapid matters dealing with feminist pondering. the quantity levels from a learn of the social geographes of whiteness within the united states to various views at the break-up in Yugoslavia.
This ebook lines the crystallisation of post-Marxism as a selected theoretical place in its personal correct and considers the position performed in its improvement through post-structuralism, postmodernism and second-wave feminism. It examines the background of dissenting developments in the Marxist culture and considers what the longer term customers of post-Marxism usually are.
This quantity of essays by way of Naomi Scheman brings jointly her perspectives on epistemic and socio-political matters, perspectives that draw on a serious analyzing of Wittgenstein in addition to on liberatory events and theories, all within the provider of a primary reorientation of epistemology. For a few theorists, epistemology is an primarily foundationalist and for that reason discredited company; for others-particularly analytic epistemologists--it is still carefully segregated from political issues.
This tremendous available textbook presents a wide-ranging research of the kinfolk among philosophy and feminist inspiration. analyzing not just feminist reviews of philosophical principles, Gatens additionally seems to be on the ways that feminist thought could be expert by means of philosophical research and debates. Gatens adopts an old technique, starting with an research of Mary Wollstonecraft's critique of Rousseau.
- Feminisms in Social Work Research: Promise and possibilities for justice-based knowledge
- Purity and Pollution: Gender, Embodiment and Victorian Medicine
- Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique
- Against Recognition
Additional resources for Objectivity in the Feminist Philosophy of Science
The feminist critiques themselves are interesting - they cite case after case of sexist and androcentric views that have leaked into supposedly objective theories and descriptions of our natural and social world but the more interesting results are the views feminists have developed about objectivity itself. Chapter 2 Power and Objectivity There has been confusion and consternation about objectivity for feminists ever since we began to suspect that the perfectly 'objectively true' view that women aren't as rational as men turned out to be, well, not all that objective, and not all that true.
Rather than claim any allegiance to a particular interpretation or application of Quine or Kuhn, my intention here is to underscore how their views have motivated and underpinned the feminist critiques of science. In addition, these views serve as points of origin for the scrutiny surrounding the concept of objectivity in science. The feminist critiques themselves are interesting - they cite case after case of sexist and androcentric views that have leaked into supposedly objective theories and descriptions of our natural and social world but the more interesting results are the views feminists have developed about objectivity itself.
This is what I take to be the most important problem highlighted by MacKinnon, and any comprehensive attempt to revise the concept of objectivity should at least give us a way to assess the effect (if any) of personal, cultural or political power on science. Wealth and Power Though MacKinnon does not address the connection between wealth and power, but rather focuses on gender and power, one should not underestimate the extent to which power may - like gender obstruct the pursuit of scientific objectivity.