By Catherine Eschle
In worldwide Democracy, Social events, and Feminism Catherine Eschle examines the connection among social routine and democracy in social and political idea within the context of debates concerning the exclusions and mobilizations generated through gender hierarchies and the impression of globalization. Eschle considers various techniques in social and political concept, from long-standing liberal, republican, Marxist and anarchist traditions, via post-Marxist and post-modernist recommendations and up to date efforts to theorize democracy and social activities at an international point. the writer turns to feminist conception and flow practices--and fairly to black and 3rd global feminist interventions--in debates concerning the democratization of feminism itself. Eschle discusses the ways that such debates are more and more performed out on an international scale as feminists grapple with the implication of globalization for move association. the writer then concludes with a dialogue of the relevance of those feminist debates for the theorization of democracy extra mostly in an period of worldwide transformation.
Read or Download Global Democracy, Social Movements, and Feminism PDF
Similar feminist theory books
Makes a speciality of feminist analyses of race and ethnicity - at the moment some of the most instant matters dealing with feminist considering. the amount levels from a research of the social geographes of whiteness within the united states to various views at the break-up in Yugoslavia.
This e-book strains the crystallisation of post-Marxism as a selected theoretical place in its personal correct and considers the position performed in its improvement through post-structuralism, postmodernism and second-wave feminism. It examines the historical past of dissenting developments in the Marxist culture and considers what the longer term clients of post-Marxism usually are.
This quantity of essays via Naomi Scheman brings jointly her perspectives on epistemic and socio-political matters, perspectives that draw on a serious studying of Wittgenstein in addition to on liberatory pursuits and theories, all within the provider of a basic reorientation of epistemology. For a few theorists, epistemology is an basically foundationalist and as a result discredited firm; for others-particularly analytic epistemologists--it is still conscientiously segregated from political matters.
This tremendous available textbook presents a wide-ranging research of the relatives among philosophy and feminist concept. studying not just feminist reviews of philosophical principles, Gatens additionally appears to be like on the ways that feminist thought may be educated by means of philosophical research and debates. Gatens adopts an old technique, starting with an research of Mary Wollstonecraft's critique of Rousseau.
- A Philosophical Investigation of Rape: The Making and Unmaking of the Feminine Self
- Theorizing Black Feminisms: The Visionary Pragmatism of Black Women
- Feminist Challenges in the Information Age: Information as a Social Resource
- Testo Junkie : Sex, Drugs, and Biopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era
Additional info for Global Democracy, Social Movements, and Feminism
1998: 300) There is an affinity here between pluralism and the resource mobilization approach in social movement theory. Both approaches share a focus on the role of groups—whether defined as interest groups or social movement organizations (SMOs)—in mobilizing resources and constituencies and pursuing interests in or against the state system (McCarthy and Zald 1977: 1218-1219). Resource mobilization theory developed partly in response to Mancur Olson's rational choice critique of the pluralist assumption that groups would naturally and spontaneously arise in society.
Republicans also have a distinctive view of power, discriminating between productive and coercive forms (Mansbridge 1996: 46-51). The former is located in the collective capacity of the people to act and, in a fundamentally nonliberal move, is seen as a positive force. Coercive power is most often located in the state, in an echo of liberalism, although there are also some parallelist formulations, influenced by leftist critiques, which insist too on the coercive potential of the capitalist economy.
It now aims to deepen the democratic nature of existing institutions rather than to abolish them. A variety of strategies have been adopted to this end. Here I want to focus on what Hirst identifies as a "new republican" tendency (1990: 3; see also Rengger 1994: 63). Republicans draw on a long-standing heritage, stemming from the ancient Greeks and Romans and filtered through the Renaissance civic humanists and Italian city-states, JeanJacques Rousseau, and Hannah Arendt. Although proponents of contemporary republicanism claim to be "distinctively modern" (Barber 1984: 38 Modernity, Social Movements, and Democracy 117), they refuse to accept that the delegation of authority to large-scale bureaucratic systems is the necessary tragedy of modernity.