By Roberta Gilchrist
Gender and Archaeology is the 1st quantity to severely evaluate the advance of this now key subject across the world, throughout a number sessions and fabric tradition. ^l Roberta Gilchrist explores the importance of the feminist epistemologies. She indicates the original viewpoint that gender archaeology can carry to undergo on matters akin to department of labour and the existence path. She examines problems with sexuality, and the embodiment of sexual id. a considerable case learn of gender house and metaphor within the medieval English citadel is used to attract jointly and illustrate those matters.
Read or Download Gender and Archaeology: Contesting the Past PDF
Best feminist theory books
Makes a speciality of feminist analyses of race and ethnicity - presently some of the most rapid matters dealing with feminist considering. the amount levels from a examine of the social geographes of whiteness within the united states to a number of views at the break-up in Yugoslavia.
This ebook lines the crystallisation of post-Marxism as a particular theoretical place in its personal correct and considers the function performed in its improvement by means of post-structuralism, postmodernism and second-wave feminism. It examines the historical past of dissenting trends in the Marxist culture and considers what the long run customers of post-Marxism usually are.
This quantity of essays via Naomi Scheman brings jointly her perspectives on epistemic and socio-political concerns, perspectives that draw on a serious studying of Wittgenstein in addition to on liberatory events and theories, all within the provider of a basic reorientation of epistemology. For a few theorists, epistemology is an basically foundationalist and consequently discredited firm; for others-particularly analytic epistemologists--it is still carefully segregated from political issues.
This super available textbook offers a wide-ranging research of the family among philosophy and feminist notion. analyzing not just feminist opinions of philosophical principles, Gatens additionally seems to be on the ways that feminist conception may be trained through philosophical research and debates. Gatens adopts an historic process, starting with an research of Mary Wollstonecraft's critique of Rousseau.
- A Companion to Feminist Geography
- Feminist Methodologies for International Relations
- Manhood and Politics
- Gender, Planning and Human Rights (International Studies of Women and Place)
- The Other: Feminist Reflections in Ethics
- Feminist science education
Additional info for Gender and Archaeology: Contesting the Past
1994: 142; Dommasnes et al. 1998: 105). Does this imbalance in the numbers of men and women affect the nature of archaeological knowledge? Would archaeology be a very different discipline if there were equal numbers and opportunities for women and men? As Joan Gero has asked, do women produce a different kind of knowledge, or construct knowledge by different processes? (Gero 1991: 98). To address this issue, Gero reviewed the contrasting approaches that male and female archaeologists have adopted in the study of lithics.
Apparently this transformation was not the result of a specific feminist programme (Haraway 1989; Zihlman 1997; Fedigan 1997); instead, a radical rethinking of human origins was stimulated by the work of women primatologists studying female non-human primates. The belief that humans evolved gradually, as a result of adaptive change, became fashionable in the second half of the nineteenth century, following the landmark publication of Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species (1859). Darwin’s key concept of ‘selection’, in which populations reproduced selectively to improve features that would complement their environment, left the issue of human sexual difference unexplained.
Here we see a return to evolutionary essentials, the sexual division of labour and reproductive roles. Ortner proposes that male dominance emerges because male domestic responsibilities (such as hunting) are more episodic, allowing greater time for male congregation. She cites Jane Collier and Michelle Rosaldo’s view that male power relations are grounded in violence (1981) and Peggy Sanday’s cross-cultural evidence for male aggressiveness (1981). This is another assertion of universals, a gauntlet which must be addressed by masculinist studies (for discussion see pp.