By Andrea Nye
A feminist method of the background of contemporary philosophy finds new insights into the lives and works of significant figures akin to Jean-Jacques Rousseau and David Hume, and is essential to an appreciation of the appearance of feminist philosophy. Feminism and glossy Philosophy introduces scholars to the most thinkers and subject matters of contemporary philosophy from varied feminist views, and highlights the function of gender in learning vintage philosophical texts.This publication exhibits how the real figures within the historical past of recent philosophy were reinterpreted by way of feminist conception, including:* feminist opinions of Descartes' rationalism* Locke's 'state of nature' because it pertains to the kin* the costs of misogyny levelled opposed to KantIn addition, the booklet introduces lesser-studied texts and interpretations, such as:* the metaphysics of Leibniz's modern, Anne Conway* Annette Baier's contemporary presentation and defence of HumeFeminism and smooth Philosophy: An creation is written in an available and full of life variety, and every bankruptcy ends with a worthy annotated advisor to additional interpreting. will probably be acceptable for philosophy in addition to gender experiences classes taking a look at the improvement of contemporary western notion.
Read Online or Download Feminism and Modern Philosophy (Understanding Feminist Philosophy) PDF
Similar feminist theory books
Specializes in feminist analyses of race and ethnicity - presently some of the most rapid concerns dealing with feminist considering. the quantity levels from a research of the social geographes of whiteness within the united states to quite a few views at the break-up in Yugoslavia.
This publication strains the crystallisation of post-Marxism as a selected theoretical place in its personal correct and considers the position performed in its improvement by means of post-structuralism, postmodernism and second-wave feminism. It examines the heritage of dissenting developments in the Marxist culture and considers what the long run clients of post-Marxism usually are.
This quantity of essays by way of Naomi Scheman brings jointly her perspectives on epistemic and socio-political concerns, perspectives that draw on a severe studying of Wittgenstein in addition to on liberatory pursuits and theories, all within the carrier of a basic reorientation of epistemology. For a few theorists, epistemology is an primarily foundationalist and as a result discredited firm; for others-particularly analytic epistemologists--it is still conscientiously segregated from political matters.
This tremendous available textbook offers a wide-ranging research of the family among philosophy and feminist suggestion. interpreting not just feminist opinions of philosophical rules, Gatens additionally appears on the ways that feminist concept should be knowledgeable by means of philosophical research and debates. Gatens adopts an ancient strategy, starting with an research of Mary Wollstonecraft's critique of Rousseau.
- Ruptures: Anti-colonial & Anti-racist Feminist Theorizing
- Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Studies in Gender, Power and Ideology
- Feminist Interpretations of Alexis de Tocqueville (Re-Reading the Canon)
- Rethinking Equality Projects in Law: Feminist Challenges (Oñati International Series in Law and Society)
- Biocultural Creatures: Toward a New Theory of the Human
Extra resources for Feminism and Modern Philosophy (Understanding Feminist Philosophy)
For many philosophers committed to logical analysis, mixing biography with theory commits a fallacy. On this view the personal life of a man who holds a belief is irrelevant to whether that belief is well founded. A proposition’s truth—the truth or falsity of Kant’s claim that reason is the basis of morality or Hume’s claim that justice is based on convenience—is logically independent of the experiential “genesis” of such ideas. How, why, or in what circumstances a philosopher comes up with an idea in no way determines the idea’s value or truth.
The modern mind claims independence from the physical body, male or female, white or nonwhite; the mind has no sex, race, or caste. If this is true, asked Lloyd, why is it that women have found philosophic reason so difficult to achieve? Why is it that women seem to resist logical, objective thought detached from passion and personal involvement? One can say that in the past women were not permitted the education and position that would have allowed them to become rational philosophers and scientists, but even now when these ﬁelds are open to women, women are still underrepresented and are not regularly named among philosophy’s leading thinkers.
The difference between Hume’s and Kant’s ethics is then one of definition and logic. The particular circumstances in which conﬂicting claims or arguments are made are irrelevant. Readers of philosophy learn to distinguish claims and evaluate arguments, skills that do not require knowledge of the private or personal lives of the men who made the claims. Feminist readings of philosophy that pay attention to gender relations challenge these standards of professional conduct, at the same time as they presuppose a different view of the role of philosophy.