By Liz Stanley
Breaking Out, one of many classics of feminist sociology, was once released by means of Routledge Kegan Paul in 1983 and hailed as a pioneering textual content within the improvement of a special feminist epistemology. it's been everyday and brought up for almost a decade. during this revised version, Liz Stanley and Sue clever find Breaking Out and its severe reception by way of educational feminism then and now, and assessment the most advancements in feminist considering on study concerns because it first seemed.
Read or Download Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology PDF
Best feminist theory books
Specializes in feminist analyses of race and ethnicity - at the moment some of the most instant concerns dealing with feminist considering. the quantity levels from a learn of the social geographes of whiteness within the united states to numerous views at the break-up in Yugoslavia.
This e-book lines the crystallisation of post-Marxism as a selected theoretical place in its personal correct and considers the position performed in its improvement by means of post-structuralism, postmodernism and second-wave feminism. It examines the historical past of dissenting developments in the Marxist culture and considers what the longer term customers of post-Marxism usually are.
This quantity of essays by way of Naomi Scheman brings jointly her perspectives on epistemic and socio-political concerns, perspectives that draw on a serious studying of Wittgenstein in addition to on liberatory activities and theories, all within the carrier of a primary reorientation of epistemology. For a few theorists, epistemology is an basically foundationalist and for that reason discredited firm; for others-particularly analytic epistemologists--it continues to be conscientiously segregated from political issues.
This super available textbook offers a wide-ranging research of the family among philosophy and feminist suggestion. studying not just feminist reviews of philosophical principles, Gatens additionally seems to be on the ways that feminist concept could be expert by way of philosophical research and debates. Gatens adopts an historic strategy, starting with an research of Mary Wollstonecraft's critique of Rousseau.
- Politics and Ethnicity: A Comparative Study
- Handbook of Diversity in Feminist Psychology
- Natural Liberty: Rediscovering Self-Induced Abortion Methods (Sage-Femme Collective)
- Murder by the Book?: Feminism and the Crime Novel (Narrative Forms and Social Formations)
- Women in the Medieval English Countryside: Gender and Household in Brigstock before the Plague
Extra resources for Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology
5). She also argues that far more serious and difficult to change than this are stereotypic ideas about women; but these too can be challenged by constantly questioning attitudes, and by being aware that such biases can affect the entire research process. And so she maintains that ‘bias’ can be removed from theory and practice and that ‘we must strive for the neutrality which true scientists exhibit’ (1975, p. 5). Chetwynd, as well as many other feminist academics, seems to accept the idea that ‘neutrality’ and ‘true science’ can be achieved within the social sciences.
23). She identifies this ‘machismo element’ as the creation of controlled realities which can be manipulated by social scientists, who at the same time remain at a safe distance from what has happened. Bernard goes on to argue that the particular methods involved in the production of controlled realities are those which yield ‘hard’ or quantified data. The production of quantified data also has more prestige than the production of qualitative or ‘soft’ data. This isn’t only because of the nature of the data produced, but also because it is primarily men who are involved with the former and women with the latter.
The transcript you have just read is edited. We decided not to identify which of us said what, so that the rest of the book isn’t seen in terms of ‘bits’ which each of us ‘really’ produced. It wasn’t written like that, and we’d rather it wasn’t read like that either. We decided to edit the tape because our purpose in using it is to communicate content and not to provide uncontaminated material for conversational analysts. And now, in the rest of this introduction, we’d like to present some rather disparate thoughts about authorship, and authorship of this book in particular, some of which deal with matters touched on in the transcript.